Studio: Paramount
Director: Parker Finn
Writer: Parker Finn
Producer: Marty Bowen, Wyck Godfrey, Isaac Klausner, Robert Salerno
Stars: Sosie Bacon, Jessie T. Usher, Kyle Gallner, Robin Weigert, Caitlin Stasey, Kal Penn, Rob Morgan, Judy Reyes, Gillian Zinser
Review Score:
Summary:
After witnessing a shocking suicide, a traumatized therapist becomes the next target of a mysterious curse.
Review:
Seeing someone commit suicide can inflict traumatic psychological damage, and Dr. Rose Cotter has had the misfortune of witnessing two. The first happened at age ten, when Rose walked in on her mother in the midst of an intentional overdose. The second happened in the hospital where Rose currently works as a therapist, and this experience promises to haunt her head in ways not even her profession has prepared her for.
Granted an emergency session with Rose, graduate student Laura Weaver ran in ranting about a malevolent entity only she can see. Supposedly, this paranormal presence has the power to look like people sporting strange smiles maniacal enough to make the Joker jealous. Laura claims it’s going to kill her, just like it did her professor, whom she watched bludgeon himself with a hammer just a few days earlier. Rose barely has a moment to diagnose Laura with hallucinations when the frightened young woman suddenly shrieks, then smiles, then calmly cuts open her throat with a broken vase shard.
Watching a woman slaughter herself in such a gruesome manner is awful enough. What happens next gets even worse.
Rose learns soon enough that Laura’s ravings were indeed real. The next victim of a curse that’s attracted to trauma, Rose has unwittingly become the next link in a chain of torment determined to unravel her mind before ultimately driving her to take her own life. Rose now has seven days to give the videotape, er, to figure out how to prevent suffering a suicidal fate, if the terrifying visions she also inherited don’t destroy her entire life along the way.
“Smile” gets more “right” than it gets “wrong,” so let’s start with what’s “good.” A list of the movie’s perks begins with Sosie Bacon’s performance in the top spot. Bacon wears worried weariness with an exceptional ability for showing how excruciating stress keeps Rose increasingly rattled. Not only that, Bacon excels at extracting sympathy for Rose’s continued crises of desperately wanting someone, anyone, to believe her.
Any discussion about “Smile” between two people who’ve seen it must include one of them asking, “Can you imagine being at that birthday party?” The film features a particular scene certain to sear into the audience’s memory for a number of reasons. One of them is the wickedly sinister suggestion of a gaggle of seven-year-olds suddenly about to be signed up for a decade of therapy. Another is Bacon delivering perhaps her most frenzied piece of acting anywhere in the film. Watching Rose helplessly realize she’s inside a manipulative hellscape no one else believes is heartbreaking, then the moment becomes alternately hilarious when Rose spontaneously tumbles through a glass table.
That vaguely vicious sense of humor gives “Smile” part of its personality. Another part comes from how writer/director Parker Finn visualizes eeriness through atmosphere. A gloomy grey color palette combined with intermittent establishing shots that swirl skylines upside down mirrors the sense of inescapable unsettledness plaguing Rose. The camera also conspicuously places shadowed doorways in backgrounds to maintain a macabre mood that hints at horrors hiding in unseen corners.
What’s not so hot? “Smile” runs ten minutes shy of two hours, which doesn’t even include credits, and that’s simply too long for a familiar, formulaic “follow the curse” thriller extended from a short film. We all know where this trail leads, and all the stops along the way, too. Struggling to be taken seriously, especially by a disbelieving husband (or fiancé in this case). Connecting dots from online research, interviewing a victim’s loved one, and acquiring a final round of exposition from someone in an asylum (or prison in this case). “Smile” takes a long route to steer us where we’ve already been before, and looking longingly out the window from a cramped backseat turns into a distraction.
It’s additionally difficult to become swallowed up by the movie because it’s not built with rich fiction in mind. Heavily reliant on traditional jump scares, “Smile’s” creepiness is constructed for making viewers grab a companion’s arm with a gasp and giggling about it afterward.
Those who want shocking twists or revelatory explanations to rationalize the movie’s thin mythology will be sorely disappointed, probably even frustrated, to discover “Smile” doesn’t offer answers to questions about its curse. Not that it helps those viewers now, but “Smile’s” big box office success assures there will eventually be a sequel, and Parker Finn may have no choice but to expand on the lore, or perhaps create it since that story doesn’t seem like it already exists. Here’s hoping Finn also adds extra substance (like a narratively useful fiancé character), and subtracts some of the meandering minutes, to make “Smile 2” a more resonant experience.
Review Score: 60
At least the movie only runs 70 minutes, though I suppose that extra 10 technically disqualifies it from being a literal amateur hour.