Studio: Netflix
Director: Fumihiko Sori
Writer: Fumihiko Sori, Takeshi Miyamoto
Producer: Yumihiko Yoshihara
Stars: Ryosuke Yamada, Tsubasa Honda, Dean Fujioka, Misako Renbutsu, Kanata Hongo, Shinji Uchiyama, Jun Kunimura, Yo Oizumi, Ryuta Sato, Fumiyo Kohinata, Yasuko Matsuyuki
Review Score:
Summary:
A young alchemist searches for a fabled stone that may allow him to transfer his brother’s soul out of a steel armor shell.
Review:
Prior to the live-action movie, I didn’t know much about Fullmetal Alchemist as a whole, other than that it has existed for quite some time in various forms of media. Originally published as a serialized manga between 2001 and 2010, Fullmetal Alchemist also spawned two anime series, two animated features, several video games, light novels, and more.
Fullmetal Alchemist is so enduringly popular, I’m blushing slightly at admitting I haven’t paid significant attention to it until now. But the fact that I instantly recognize its red-coated, blonde-haired, glove-wearing hero and his steel armored partner, without previously knowing their names or consuming their adventures, says something about how the property has permeated the pop culture consciousness.
Anytime I review an adaptation of something so treasured, I usually open with a bit of background like the above to let readers know what page I’m starting on. Invariably, opinions in these cases often split along dividing lines according to personal investment in an IP. So you’ll find naysayers wagging fingers because “so and so was changed” or “such and such wasn’t exactly like it is in the source material.” Meanwhile, newcomers shrug shoulders with, “eh, I don’t see the problem.”
Refer to any online discourse involving Netflix’s previous anime adaptation “Death Note” (review here) for an example. In the meantime, consider this my declaration that I have no dogs in such fights where the “Fullmetal Alchemist” film is concerned. I’m coming in cold to its world of early 20th century industry meets monster-summoning magic.*
*I know. As the movie explains, alchemy is science-based, thus not truly magic at all.
Two young brothers, Ed and Al, aspire to be science-minded conjurers of sorts. They’re gifted at alchemy, but get in over their heads when they break a taboo by trying to resurrect the dead. Ed literally pays with an arm and a leg while Al loses his entire body.
Ed ends up with mechanical limbs. Al’s soul becomes embedded in a suit of armor. The siblings’ new lifelong goal involves finding the fabled Philosopher’s Stone, which could be capable of putting Al back into his human body.
Whether the Philosopher’s Stone actually exists or not, several lesser stones are also causing conflicts. Three seemingly immortal beings known as The Homunculi are up to no good while several military men and women stand in opposition to their evil plans. With a traitor somewhere in the military’s midst, Ed, Al, and their childhood friend Winry get caught in a conspiracy set to expose the most devastating alchemy secret yet.
When you remember that creator Hiromu Arakawa spent ten years developing Fullmetal Alchemist in static illustration form, it’s easy to see why the Fullmetal wiki houses a daunting depository of seemingly countless characters, places, plots, etc. Considering how much material is available for employment, “Fullmetal Alchemist” mostly chews off only what is essential for its streamlined adaptation, and what is digestible for neophytes who have a lot to get up to speed on. Again, mostly.
A fair deal of exposition ends up unpacked, but not so much that your memory has to rewind far to recall where/when someone was introduced, or to keep subplots straight. The movie does still have a few extraneous characters however. As an outsider, I can point out a few individuals who would work better as one singular person if only a compact film script is considered. Yet they probably weren’t merged specifically to stay true to the series, or to satisfy dedicated fans.
I suppose the undesirable alternative to including more material than functionally necessary is to pare things down like “The Dark Tower” (review here) did, i.e. stripping fiction to where a few names are retained while everything else remains unrecognizable. No one wants to see that happen to a beloved property again. Thus, I have to curtail how far I take criticism of a film for being “too accurate,” even when erecting speed bumps that harangue momentum.
At the same time, it’s difficult to not wish “Fullmetal Alchemist” had cracked at the screenplay another time or two to find the solidly enjoyable 90-minute movie inside its two hour and 14 minute frame. The content itself may not be overwhelming. But chatty conversations introducing everything pull out the pace, allowing the accordion of action and interludes to sag overmuch during the latter.
When those interludes manage to hit emotional beats on their heads, hiccupping tempo becomes a secondary concern anyway. Between brotherly love boiling over into frustration and a disturbing reveal regarding the fate of a little girl and her family’s dog, I have a hard time choosing which of “Fullmetal Alchemist’s” heartbreakers punches the gut hardest. Rain spattering the photo of a pregnant wife may be manipulative, but the surprising sadness motivating several moments adds unexpected maturity to the cartoonish conflicts of cyclopean creatures and megalomaniac soldiers.
Quieter lulls like those won’t win favor with anyone expecting more electric activity. “Fullmetal Alchemist’s” post-title opening promises cinematic craziness in what ends up being the movie’s best sequence. Never again does anything come close to equaling the explosiveness of stone creatures crumbling tall towers during alchemy anarchy, not even the climax. It’s both odd and disappointing that the film frontloads in this manner only to slow down somewhat instead of speeding up.
Nevertheless, some compelling characters, even when they’re short on real estate to develop relationships as far as they could conceivably go, add oomph in areas where the movie otherwise misses it. It’s obvious Winry means more to Ed in the manga than she does in the movie for example, given the hints at their background that this script has no available time for. But there’s enough sincerity in what does make it onscreen to put plentiful heart and humor into animation-inspired energy.
Franchise fans may have dissenting perspectives on how well “Fullmetal Alchemist” fulfills its potential, or how faithful it is as an adaptation. I don’t have either barometer. I can only convey that the live-action movie, while choppy in its narrative plotting, by and large entertains as a standalone entity of uniquely intriguing imagination.
NOTES: There is a post-credits scene. The original Japanese title is “Hagane no renkinjutsushi.”
Review Score: 70
At least the movie only runs 70 minutes, though I suppose that extra 10 technically disqualifies it from being a literal amateur hour.